image


image

a

d

CCllaarriifificcaattiioonnssnEExxppeeccttaattiioonns

With the Joint Commissions DireCtor of engineering: george mills

Living Better in the Built Environment

Make sure the environment of care is both safe and

comfortable for patients, visitors, and staff


Environment of Care® News publishes the column Clarifications and Expectations, authored by George Mills, MBA, FASHE, CEM, CHFM, CHSP, director, Depart- ment of Engineering, The Joint Commis- sion, to clarify standards expectations and provide compliance strategies.


H

ospitals and health care facil- ities need to be secure, clean, and well managed to ensure

that patients receive and staff provide the best care and treatment possible. But safe and controlled doesn’t have to mean cold, harsh, impersonal, or catering pre- dominantly to the caregiver. Particularly in patient recovery rooms and rest areas,

the environment needs to be comfortable and look and feel less institutional than it was decades ago.

Current Joint Commission stan- dards are sensitive to this goal, and organizations today are placing a greater priority on making the envi- ronment of care feel both safer and

more like home. From using esthetically pleasing colors and carpeting in patient care units to checking more carefully for hidden hazards, the modern clinical milieu is more patient friendly than ever before. This month’s column exam- ines various standards and elements of performance (EPs) that help ensure a higher standard of living and safety in the built environment.

EC.02.06.01: The hospital establishes and maintains a safe, functional environment.

Features of a health care facility’s physical space affect the outcomes, safety, and satisfaction of patients, as well as of families, staff, and others in the organiza- tion. These features include the size and configuration of space, noise level, pri- vacy, patient security, and clear access to internal/external doors. When properly designed into and managed as part of the built environment, these elements pro- mote safe and comfortable surroundings that foster patient dignity and enable ease of patient-staff interaction.

To reflect the desire to create a home- like effect and residential feel in a health care setting, the two key EPs to examine here are 1 and 13:

A surveyor will score EP 1 if he or she discovers anything unsafe in the patient care environment—which comprises the spaces where the patients live and cohab- itate and guests visit. Creating a comfort- able and protected environment means removing any hazards. As examples, there can’t be any rips in the carpeting, which can be a trip hazard; medical gas cylinders need to be properly secured so

they don’t roll off a cart or fall over and become potential projectiles, nor can cylinders be placed between a patients’ legs on the stretcher; and, in a behavioral health care unit, exposed plumbing, which could be a ligature point where self-harm or harm to others could occur, poses risks.

When a potential risk related to EP 1 is discovered, the organization should consider conducting a risk assessment that indicates whether it’s a real risk in the organization’s environment. With the exposed plumbing scenario, for instance, the caregiver in the area should know

if the organization has completed a risk assessment and what the outcome was. Instead of protecting patients through the built environment, you may be pro- tecting them via staffing. Or you could have a strategy in which, for example, in a unit with 10 beds, a patient escalating through his or her treatment program would advance from a protected environ- ment (no exposed plumbing in room 1) to a less protected environment (exposed plumbing in room 10). The risk assess- ment process would demonstrate that the patient is, in fact, protected using

a strategy that helps the patient adjust to life and environmental conditions

outside the building. (For more informa- tion on conducting a risk assessment, see Environment of Care News, March 2013, Volume 16, Issue 3, pages 6–8.)

EP 13 pertains more to the built envi- ronment, where patients are housed on a

(continued on page 8)

Clarifications and Expectations: Living Better in the Built Environment (continued from page 7)


day-to-day basis. If a surveyor notices a lot of blankets on patients in a particular unit, he or she might believe there is a problem with temperature control. If

a surveyor observes condensation on the patient room windows, he or she may suspect there is excess humidity in the unit, which could lead to mold growth— a potentially serious patient health hazard.

storage and trash collection rooms, flam- mable liquid storage rooms, laboratories, and piped oxygen tank supply rooms.

The primary focus here, related to this month’s topic, is abiding by EP 2:

The value of having a written policy banning smoking in all buildings is that it gives staff an official document to cite, point to, or provide when they have a visitor, patient, or coworker who desires to smoke or vape (see the “Clarifications and Expectations” column in the January 2015 issue for standards related to e-ciga- rettes). This policy should be included in signage indicating that yours is a smoke- free building.

Certain exceptions can be allowed, such as adults in a behavioral health care unit who want to smoke under the

supervision of their physician. If your organization needs to accommodate this situation, it may need to separate the patients from the main population by allowing smoking in (1) a designated outdoor area (such as a patio); and/or

(2) a specially ventilated interior space, using a negative exhaust system, non- combustible ashtrays, and metal contain- ers with self-closing lids where ashes can be discarded.

Your organization should implement and support its no-smoking policy, taking steps to prevent smoking incidents from happening in the first place. Consider providing clinical support for smoking cessation programs while smokers

are patients.


image

Safe, sound, and snug Thankfully, for patients and staff alike, the health care setting has evolved into a more user-friendly, warm, enriching milieu over the years. Ultimately, our goal is to remove the fear that institutionalized en- vironments can suffer from by nurturing the built environment and creating more comfortable and protected surroundings that support patient care delivery. EC


Copyright 2015 The Joint Commission

Page 11